Clayton Christensen, Guru of ‘Disruptive Innovation,’ Dies at 67
A fellow consultant, Tom Meyer, led me to read about this unique professor who impacted so many business leaders over the last few decades. Below I share an overview of his life summarized from his obituary in the New York Times and urge you to read the two books mentioned. You can learn from Professor Christensen through the TED Talk link below where he asks and answers the question “How Will You Measure Your Life”. All great food for thought for any leader.
Professor Christensen broke ground with his assertion that the factors that helped the best companies succeed were also the reasons some of those same companies failed.
Clayton M. Christensen, a Harvard professor whose groundbreaking 1997 book, “The Innovator’s Dilemma,” outlined his theories about the impact of what he called “disruptive innovation” on leading companies and catapulted him to superstar status as a management guru, died on Thursday (January 23. 2020) in a Boston hospital. He was 67. Nitin Nohria, the dean of the Harvard Business School, said in a statement that the cause was complications of leukemia.
“The Innovator’s Dilemma,” which The Economist called one of the six most important business books ever written, was published during the technology boom of the late 1990s. It trumpeted Professor Christensen’s assertion that the factors that help the best companies succeed — listening responsively to customers, investing aggressively in technology products that satisfied customers’ next-generation needs — are the same reasons some of these companies fail.
These corporate giants were so focused on doing the very things that had been taught for generations at the nation’s top business schools, he wrote, that they were blindsided by small, fast-moving, innovative companies that were able to enter markets nimbly with disruptive products and services and grab large chunks of market share. By laying out a blueprint for how executives could identify and respond to these disruptive forces, Professor Christensen, himself an entrepreneur and former management consultant, struck a chord with high-tech corporate leaders.
Andy Grove, then the chief executive of Intel, said at an industry conference about a year after “The Innovator’s Dilemma” was published that it was the most important book he had read in 10 years. That praise helped make the book a best seller (it had sold more than a half-million copies by 2007), and Professor Christensen a marquee name in the business world.
A Rhodes scholar who had studied econometrics at Oxford University and a graduate of the Harvard Business School, Professor Christensen joined the school’s faculty in 1992. A former basketball star (he stood 6-foot-8) as well as an affable academic, he focused as much on a life well lived as he did on his management theories.
A member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, he incorporated his musings on religion into his academic work, especially after learning that he had lymphoma in 2010. Soon after that, he had a stroke, which forced him to relearn how to speak, but he remained an active faculty member, mentoring students and developing popular curriculum offerings.
Clayton attended Brigham Young University, taking two years off to be a Mormon missionary in South Korea (where he became fluent in Korean) before returning to graduate in 1975. After graduating with an M.B.A. from Harvard in 1979, Professor Christensen joined Boston Consulting Group. He and a group of M.I.T. professors later founded Ceramics Process Systems Corporation, which he ran as chief executive for much of the 1980s.
He made the career switch into academia in 1992, when he joined the Harvard Business School faculty, and for many years he taught a course called “Building and Sustaining a Successful Enterprise.” He focused his theories on a wide range of industries, from education to health care. “One of the things that gave my dad’s research such power was its credibility and practicality — having been a leader and executive himself, he knew what would be meaningful and relevant in the real world,” his oldest son, Matthew, said in a statement. “He knew that because of culture and inertia, sometimes the right thing to do was counterintuitive, perhaps even hard.”
When he learned he had cancer, Professor Christensen decided to write about how he had reconsidered his impact on the business world. In 2012 he published “How Will You Measure Your Life?”, a book, written with two co-authors, that was based on an article of the same title that had appeared in Harvard Business Review. In it, he recast his management theories as a formula for measuring how best to live one’s life.
On the last day of his management class every semester, he wrote, he asked his students to “turn those theoretical lenses on themselves” and answer three questions: “First, how can I be sure that I’ll be happy in my career? Second, how can I be sure that my relationships with my spouse and my family become an enduring source of happiness? Third, how can I be sure I’ll stay out of jail? Though the last question sounds lighthearted, it’s not. Two of the 32 people in my Rhodes scholar class spent time in jail. Jeff Skilling of Enron fame was a classmate of mine at HBS. These were good guys—but something in their lives sent them off in the wrong direction.”
Ultimately, the realization that his ideas had generated enormous revenue for companies that used his research left him dissatisfied. “I know I’ve had a substantial impact,” he wrote. “But as I’ve confronted this disease, it’s been interesting to see how unimportant that impact is on me now. I’ve concluded that the metric by which God will assess my life isn’t dollars but the individual people whose lives I’ve touched.
“Don’t worry about the level of individual prominence you have achieved,” he continued; “worry about the individuals you have helped become better people.”
Please send me your comments about the above.